Joan of Arch represents many things, among them are valor in the face of death (the enemy in battle and the Church) and the paradox of deep spirituality and the killing profession in one person. She also personified the age-old conflict between those who display shaman-like abilities and those in control of the local priesthood, as described by the anthropologist E.A Hoebel:

“Although in many primitive cultures there is a recognized division of function between priests and shamans, in the more highly developed cultures in which cults have become strongly organized churches, the priesthood fights an unrelenting war again shamans….Priests work in a rigorously structured hierarchy fixed in a firm set of traditions. Their power comes from and is vested in the organization itself. They constitute a religious bureaucracy.”

“Shamans, on the other hand, are arrant individualists. Each is on his own, undisciplined by bureaucratic control; hence a shaman is always a threat to the order of the organized church. In the view of the priests they are presumptive pretenders. Joan of Arc was a shaman for she communed directly with the angels of God. She steadfastly refused to recant and admit delusion and her martyrdom was ordained by the functionaries of the Church. The struggle between shaman and priest may well be a death struggle.”

She was nineteen years old when she was executed in 1431. It is absolutely fair to add that she was French woman tried by an ecclesiastical court under English jurisdiction during a time when the English occupied northern France. It’s equally fair to add that it took the Catholic Church almost five hundred years to canonize her a Saint.

Quote from: Lila: An Inquiry Into Morals by Robert M. Pirsig.

Thomas Merton is venerated by some as an (officially) unrecognized saint. In other circles he’s known as an Ascended Master. The more common view is that he was one of the great spiritual writers of the Twentieth Century.

 

”A happiness that is sought for ourselves alone can never be found: for a happiness that is diminished by being shared is not big enough to make us happy.”

“There is a false and momentary happiness in self-satisfaction, but it always leads to sorrow because it narrows and deadens our spirit. True happiness is found in unselfish love, a love which increases in proportion as it is shared. There is no end to the sharing of love, and, therefore, the potential happiness of such love is without limit. Infinite sharing is the law of God’s inner life. He has made the sharing of ourselves the law of our own being, so that it is in loving others that we best love ourselves. In disinterested activity we best fulfill our own capacities to act and to be.”

“Yet there can never be happiness in compulsion. It is not enough for love to be shared: it must be shared freely. That is to say it must be given, not merely taken. Unselfish love that is poured out upon a selfish object does not bring perfect happiness: not because love requires a return or a reward for loving, but because it rests in the happiness of the beloved. And if the one loved receives love selfishly, the lover is not satisfied. He sees that his love has failed to make the beloved happy. It has not awakened his capacity for unselfish love.”

“Hence the paradox that unselfish love cannot rest perfectly except in a love that is perfectly reciprocated: because it knows that the only true peace is found in selfless love. Selfless love consents to be loved selflessly for the sake of the beloved. In so doing, it perfects itself.”

“The gift of love is the gift of the power and the capacity to love, and, therefore, to give love with full effect is also to receive it. So, love can only be kept by being given away, and it can only be given perfectly when it is also received.”

“Clean, unselfish love does not live on what it gets but on what it gives. It increases by pouring itself out for others, grows by self-sacrifice and becomes mighty by throwing itself away.”

- Thomas Merton

PUL (Pure Unconditional Love) is the highest form of Love, synonomous with God/All There Is. It is an energy. It is a force. It has intelligence. It can be given to someone personally in an hands-on way for healing or as a way to show someone how much you love them in the deepest way possible that words cannot describe.

It is ultimately what everything is made of, here and there.
It is a subjective experience; describing it circumscribes it at the same time.
It is all emcompassing. It is the meaning of life; it is life itself.
It is how we are all connected, and to be aware of this connection with just one person is still a very beautiful thing.
It should be the goal of all interpersonal relationships. Between say, spouses, it elevates their relationship past the normal, personality (compatibility) based mode to a highly spiritual experience, a light between them and to those around them.
It is mystical, magical, and at the same time as real as anything real can be.
It is the goal, the pinnacle, the apex of spirituality.
It is the barometer of truth.
It is love that is kind, patient, even-tempered, unconditional, pure. It is most often seen in small children. It surpasses emotional or physical love.
It is a Love that is big enough to make us happy because it isn’t diminished by being shared.
It is why we are here. To learn PUL. To become as Christ/Bhudda/Krishna – like as possible.
It is the meaning and purpose behind all true religious expression.

This is The Spiritual Fire

Monks have been known throughout history for demonstrating abilities beyond the reach of most people. Christian monks are no exception. Here is an account from a message board of the abilities of some Orthodox monks in the U.S. As a former Orthodox Christian, this account doesn’t surprise me at all. My response follows afterward.

“I had been invited to teach a series of workshops in Anchorage and the following weekend I taught a workshop on Kodiak Island. After the final workshop on the island, I had a few days off. My organizer gave me a few options, and I chose the boat ride to a small island inhabited by Russian Orthodox monks where an Orthodox saint had lived. I was told that visitors more often than not, had to turn back due to rough seas. In fact, I was told the prelates of the Church in charge of the monastery had never been able to see it, as every time they went for a visit, high seas forced them back.

This was a source of immense humor among the native peoples.
We took a small airplane ride to a nearby island and landed on a spit of land that ended abruptly into turbulent and frigid waters. We were greeted by a local fisherman’s wife driving a pickup truck, and I hopped in the back of the Ford. My organizer got in the front.

It was summer, but there was a light snowfall as we headed for her house by the sea. I remember feeling quite cold and wondering how in the hell people survived here in the winter. We pulled up to a small house surrounded by cedar trees and went inside. Sitting by a large wooden table we sipped tea. Now anyone who has been to northern Alaska knows that time is a strange bird in these parts. We just sat and sat, talking a little here and there, waiting it seemed for some opportune time to leave. Finally, our host announced that it was time to go, and we piled back into the Ford pickup, and headed for the dock where her husband was waiting with a fishing trawler.

We took off across an amazingly placid sea. Our host sat next to a boom, knitting, and commented how unusual it was to have such a calm passing. I sat looking out at the rich unbelievably beautiful landscape of the neighboring islands as our boat chugged along at a fairly crisp pace. Seals followed us part way.

Passing an outcropping of boulders, we came into a small natural harbor. The water was too shallow for the trawler, so we got into a dinghy and headed to shore. The scene was like something out of the Middle Ages. A group of men were on the beach burning brush, the air thick with billows of white smoke which swirled in eddies against a stark blue sky. The monks wore long beards, typical of Russian and Greek Orthodox clerics, and they were wearing long grey robes with thin ropes tied about the waist. Each one of them also wore a crucifix.

Stepping out of the boat onto the sand, we were greeted by someone who appeared to be in his early thirties and had the air of authority about him. Our host explained that I had come from Washington State to visit. The Abbott smiled approvingly and proceeded to take us on a tour of the small monastery, which consisted of perhaps a dozen men or so. As we headed up a path into the shade of cedars, he noted that the monastery did not often get to host pilgrims.

He took us to several spots including the small hut where the saint lived. I recall the air being musty from the old manuscripts and pictures of icons that had been in the saint’s possession. But there was also an unmistakable sense of serenity. The Abbott also took us to a sacred spring reputed to have healing powers. Finally he took us to the small chapel where the saint had been previously buried. His body had since been removed, but the site was still considered holy.

The Abbott caught me staring at a corner of the chapel. He asked me what I was seeing, and I said I was seeing a column of white light coming out of the floor and going up through the roof. The Abbott seemed to smile a bit and said that the saint had been buried in that corner of the church. Then he said something in a somewhat dreamy voice as if he were part way into another world, I remember his words because they sounded so odd to me at the time, “would that we were all so sensitive.”
Seeming to rouse himself from his reveries, the Abbott said, “There is one more thing I would like to show you.”

He guided us back down the hill to a very small chapel that had obviously just recently been built. It was quite unusual in that it was perhaps nine feet square and some twenty feet tall. The inside of the building glowed from the gold pigments of recently painted icons. They depicted the life of Saints along with other prominent figures of the Russian Orthodox Church. In the back of the chapel there was a very small altar with a Bible in Russian.

The Abbott pointed out the various icons and their meanings and then said that the tour had come to an end. He motioned us out of the chapel and closed the door behind us. I remember suddenly having a question about mysticism I thought the Abbott might be able to clarify. I knocked at the door, but there was no answer. I knocked again, still no sign of anyone inside.

Gingerly I opened the door to find the chapel completely empty. For a moment I stood in shock. Then my ever-skeptical mind came in, and I began to search for trap doors or other entrances. I even picked up the small frayed rug on the floor to see if there was a secret exit. Nothing.
Still in a kind of shock, I wandered out the door and on to the beach where our party was waiting. There, clearly in view was the Abbott. He was talking to my host, and as I stepped up he nodded his head with a distinct twinkle in his eyes. We boarded the dinghy and headed back to trawler. The sun was low in sky, and I stood on the deck looking over the stern as we headed back into the sea. I was very quiet.

As I write these words I am caught up in the feelings of awe and wonder I felt then. I had known the siddhis existed, had studied the physics of them, and had made it a hobby of mine to collect stories and documentations. But here on a small island off Kodiak, a humble contemplative had shown me the mystery of yogic powers firsthand.
Halfway through the ride back, the fisherman’s wife turned from her knitting and said, “You know, they do things like that all the time!”
“Things like what, I asked?”
“Oh, you know, teleporting, bi-locating… things like that.”
“Really,” I said.
“Yes,” she replied, not taking her eyes off her knitting. “That island is a remote place. There is no mail service. We see them sometimes in town picking up their mail and buying things. And…” she said in a most conspiratorial tone, “they don’t have any way of getting there!”"

My response:

Orthodox monks often bury their reposed brothers to see if their bodies remain ‘uncorrupted’, that is, not rotted away. The remains of monks are not embalmed. Uncorrupted relics are a sign of a monk having reached Theoria (Divinization). In other words, that monk has become as Christ-like as is possible for a incarnated person to become. It’s not a stand alone sign of sainthood, but it’s a biggie. It indicates that the saint has spiritualized his/her body. These kinds of relics often give off a pleasant, sweet smell and miraculous powers are often attributed to them.

An example of this is St John Maximovitch of San Francisco. He reposed in 1966 and his relics were examined in 1994. The following links are not for the squeamish:

St John in 1966:

http://www.orthodoxphotos.com/cgi-bin/photo.pl?path=Holy_Relics/St._John_Maximovitch&file=1.jpg

St John in 1994:

http://www.orthodoxphotos.com/cgi-bin/photo.pl?path=Holy_Relics/St._John_Maximovitch&file=6.jpg

The Orthodox (Greek, Russian, et al.) have a large monastic community on Mt. Athos in Greece that has existed since the time of the Roman Emporer Justinian.

They practice a form of meditation by repetition of the Jesus Prayer (‘Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on me a sinner’). This is part of what is known as Hesychasm. This has produced some startling results. The following is an except of a text written in the fourteenth century by Callistus, Patriarch of Constantinople (aka Byzantium/New Rome/Instanbul) and his co-author and fellow monk Ignatius of Xantholoulos:

“Thus, light springs forth for them, as from the sun’s disc, and enables them spiritually to reason, judge, see, foresee and the like. In general, through Him all showing and revelation of unknown mysteries shines forth for them; and they become filled with supernatural and Divine power in the Holy Spirit. This supernatural power renders their flesh lighter or rather finer and makes them soar on high like a meteor. By this power of light in the Holy Spirit some of the holy fathers, while still in their bodies, traversed wide rivers and deep seas dry-footed, as though immaterial and incorporeal. They covered in a moment great distances, requiring many days of travel and performed many other marvellous deeds in heaven, on earth, in the sun, on the seas, in deserts, in cities, in every place and country, in beasts, in reptiles and generally in every creature and every element–and they were glorified. When they stood at prayer, their holy and precious bodies were lifted off the ground as though on wings; after death they remained uncorrupted and performed signs and miracles…”

Taken from: Callistus, Ignatius. Directions to Hesychasts, #95. Writings from the Philokalia on Prayer of the Heart. Trans. E. Kadloubovshy and G.E.H. Palmer. London, Boston: Faber and Faber 1992

Si volumus non redire, currendum est. (If we wish not to go backwards, we must run.) – Pelagius

Patriotism is organized idolatry, a compelling pseudo-religion. If you say you love your country then you love everyone in it, for what is your country if not its people? Surely it’s not real estate, money, and military power. Its people include strangers and enemies, your neighbors. Do you love them too? Do you really? Patriotism is social idolatry and a mass distraction from the hard work right in front of us: learning unconditional love.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.